Frankly, it is my firm belief that there has been too much pussyfooting over the years by all those who claim that they want to lead us to the Promised Land. In essence, the head of stateusually a monarch or president, is a ceremonial figurehead who is the theoretical, nominal or de jure source of executive power within the system.
In this vein, the governor general, though he or she may have the nominal powers to "check" those of the prime minister, in practice he or she remains, for all intents and purposes, a mere figurehead who is not expected to intervene in day-to-day politics.
George I of Great Britain reigned to was the first British monarch to delegate some executive powers to a Prime Minister and a cabinet of the ministers,[ citation needed ] largely because he was also the monarch of Hanover in Germany and did not speak English fluently.
In the meantime, Government backbenchers, who are members of parliament of the ruling party but who are neither in the Cabinet nor state ministers, remain for all intents and purposes rubber stamps, who must Westminster whitehall model in the caribbean the parliamentary whip and leader of government business with respect to how they vote.
However, the extent of such powers varies from one country to another and is often a matter of controversy. How can we be happy when the majority of Jamaicans continue to say, "A plague on both your houses?
Has it not dawned on us that our sovereignty is now being compromised by an IMF deal that puts our minister of finance and the Government in a genuflecting position? As a result, after 51 years of political independence, Jamaica still has as its head of state a British queen Elizabeth IIand continues to take the Royal Oath pledging allegiance to her, her heirs and successors including the newly born Prince George.
That is the British Constitution. Incidentally, far too many Jamaicans, even among the more educated and seasoned public officials, say "Westminister". In a parliamentary republic like India, the President is the de jure executive, even though executive powers are essentially instituted by the Prime Minister of India and the Council of Ministers.
The reserve powers of the head of state are sufficient to ensure compliance with some of their wishes.
Eric Williams Trinidad and Tobago July Let us not make the mistake of describing as colonial, institutions which are part and parcel of the heritage of this country.
The retention of the Westminster-Whitehall model has resulted in lasting institutions that, to the detriment of the populace they serve, are resistant to change.
An executive branch led by the head of government usually made up of members of the legislature with the senior members of the executive in a cabinet adhering to the principle of cabinet collective responsibility ; such members execute executive authority on behalf of the nominal or theoretical executive authority.
A president, monarch, or governor-general might possess clearly significant reserve powers. I am getting sick and tired of hearing us every year trumpeting out the same diatribe about how well we have done in track and field and music, as if that is all that the renowned Brand Jamaica stands for.
Unlike the uncodified British constitution, most countries that use the Westminster system have codified the system, at least in part, in a written constitution. As an illustrative example, in the Australian constitutional crises of the Governor-General of Australia, Sir John Kerrdismissed Prime Minister Gough Whitlam on his own reserve-power authority and replaced him with opposition leader Malcolm Fraser.
Repeated pronouncements by successive prime ministers about going the republican route, which would see us relinquishing the British monarchy, have so far been just a lot of hot air. If, for instance the British Prime Minister wished to dissolve parliament in order for a general election to take place, the Prime Minister is constitutionally bound to request permission from the sovereign in order to attain such a wish.
In practice, Cabinet ministers do not have much independence to actively disagree with government policy. In this sense Bagehot was stating that the sovereign should be a focal point for the nationwhile the PM and cabinet actually undertook executive decisions.
Operation[ edit ] The pattern of executive functions within a Westminster System is quite complex. Exceptions to this include New Zealand, which changed in to use mixed-member proportional representation ; Israelwhich has always used country wide proportional representation; and Australia, which uses preferential voting in the House of Representatives elections and Single transferable vote in the Senate.
In Commonwealth realms such as Canada, Australia and New Zealand, the Prime Minister is obligated to seek permission from the Governor-General when implementing executive decisions, in a manner similar to the British practice.
A legislature, often bicameralwith at least one elected house — although unicameral systems also exist; legislative members are usually elected by district in first-past-the-post elections as opposed to country-wide proportional representation.
All ministers, whether senior and in the Cabinet, or junior ministers, must support the policy of the government publicly regardless of any private reservations. Ironically, their Opposition counterparts get far more leeway, which is why very often even the nearsighted media in this regard criticises "silent Government MPs" as against the very vocal Opposition MPs.CARIBBEAN POLITICS and SOCIETY The Westminster\Whitehall Model in the Caribbean The Westminster model is the system.
of practices and conventions that have formed the basis of the British governmental system. The name is derived from the British parliament that is located at Westminster in London, England.5/5(5). Caribbean have inherited and modeled their systems of government based on that of the British Westminster model of government.
Therefore many On one hand, the Westminster-Whitehall model has enabled many countries in the region to have reputable and consolidated democracies; the benefit.
The Westminster system was adopted by a number of countries which subsequently evolved or reformed their system of government departing from the original model.
In some cases, certain aspects of the Westminster. All of the 11 other Commonwealth Caribbean countries have retained the parliamentary model that is the hallmark of the Westminster-Whitehall model.
Floreat The Westminster Model? 3 was made as to the law which inheres in Westminster model Constitutions. So there has been across dimensions of time, and at different levels of educated discourse, an impressive consensus that the member States of the Commonwealth in the Caribbean enjoy the Westminster system.
In Constitutional Development in the Commonwealth Caribbean, Hamid Ghany delves into constitutional evolution in the Caribbean and demonstrates how political elites in the Caribbean have manipulated political processes to maintain their hold on power behind a façade of a desire for change.
The retention of the Westminster-Whitehall model has.Download