In the sociology of deviance, the labelling theory of deviant behaviour is often used interchangeably with the societal reaction theory of deviancy. Furthermore, the distinctiveness of the approach is that it draws attention to deviance as the outcome of social imputations and the exercise of social control.
This paper, not a summary, provides a brief history of labelling theory, as well as, its role in the sociology of deviance. Labelling theory is constituted essentially by two propositions. To conclude this case, the majority has the power to decide what deviance is and they organize actions to against those who are considered as deviant.
The main result of my report is deviance is a relative idea; it can be modified from time to time, culture to culture or even can be changed according several factors such as age, gender… et cetera.
In labeling theory, people usually negatively label minorities or those seen as deviant from standard cultural norms and the reaction of majorities is to label the person as having offended against their social or moral norms of behavior. Beckerone of the earlier interaction theorists, claimed that, social groups create deviance by making the rules whose infraction constitute deviance, and by applying those rules to particular people and labelling them as outsiders.
Labelling theory is also interested in the effect of labelling individuals. For some people once a deviant label has been applied, in terms of a deviant self-concept, they accept themselves as a deviant, however, this can only make room for further deviant acts to be made.
Look at a situation where a policeman holds stereotypes about typical criminals. It shows that a deviant act can be committed in one society that breaks a social norm there, but may be normal for another society. The society and public keep telling us parallel trader are affecting Hong Kong and negatively label them.
In order to prove my result, here are several examples.
Friends will most likely not want to associate with him and employers will not employ him due to his criminal record. Cannabis considered to be drug in Hong Kong, therefore the public consider smoke cannabis is deviant. In addition, about the labeling theory to this case is applicable but it does not cause secondary deviance due to the one who defraud CSSA can no longer apply for CSSA and will be put into jail so that the labeling theory to this case does not cause further deviance.
The other case study is drug abuse; the society and government keep telling us to stay away from drug by setting a lot of anti-drug policies.
Labelling theory is very complex, making it quite different than other theories. It causes further deviance due to the people who are labeled cannot escape from the label and do it accordingly called secondary deviance.
The master status is the attached label that is normally seen as a characteristic of more importance than all other aspects of the person. First is the primary deviance, which is mean any general deviance before the deviant is labeled.Edwin Lemert's and John Kitsuse's rather different uses of the term “imputation” are used to locate a central theoretical tension of the labeling perspective, one that has been most.
The main Theory in interaction perspective is labeling theory, it holds that deviance is not inherent to an act but instead focuses on the tendency of majorities to negatively label minorities or those seen as deviant from standard cultural norms.
Published: Wed, 31 Dec Deviance is a term used by society to define behaviors that differ from the everyday social norm, this means that majority of people in a society must agree or conform to a certain action or behavior. Abstract. Edwin Lemert's and John Kitsuse's rather different uses of the term “imputation” are used to locate a central theoretical tension of the labeling perspective, one that has been most systematically expressed in labeling.
Deviance This Essay Deviance and other 64,+ term papers, labelling theory, interactionist perspective, and the social constructionist perspective. In the sociology of deviance, the labelling theory of deviant behaviour is often used interchangeably with the societal reaction theory of deviancy.
Furthermore, the distinctiveness of the 4/4(1). They may also engage in retrospective labeling (interpreting someone's past in light of some present deviance) and/or projective labeling (using a .Download